| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
| 3. |  | SILVA, R. F. B. da; BATISTELLA, M.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; MORAN, E.; MARTINELLI, L. A.; DOU, Y.; LIU, J. Three decades of changes in Brazilian municipalities and their food production systems. Land, v. 9, n. 11, p. 1-17, Nov. 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|    |
| 4. | | VICTORIA, D. de C.; SILVA, R. F. B. da; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; KATERINCHUK, V.; BATISTELLA, M. Transport cost to port though Brazilian federal roads network: dataset for years 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2017. Data in Brief, v. 36, p. 1-10, June 2021. Article 107070.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 7. | | SILVA, R. F. B. da; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; VIÑA, A.; DOU, Y.; MORAN, E.; BATISTELLA, M.; LAPOLA, D. M.; LIU, J. Balancing food production with climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science of The Total Environment, v. 904, 166681, Dec. 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|  |
| 8. | | DOU, Y.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; SILVA, R. F. B. da; MCCORD, P.; VIÑA, A.; SONG, Q.; YU, Q.; WU, W.; BATISTELLA, M.; MORAN, E.; LIU, J. Land-use changes across distant places: design of a telecoupledagent-based model. Journal of Land Use Science, v. 14, n. 3, p. 191-209, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 9. | | SILVA, R. F. B. da; VICTORIA, D. de C.; NOSSACK, F. A.; VIÑA, A.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; VIEIRA, S. A.; BATISTELLA, M.; MORAN, E.; LIU, J. Slow-down of deforestation following a Brazilian forest policy was less effective on private lands than in all conservation areas. Communications Earth & Environment, v. 4, 111, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 10. | | LIU, J.; DOU, Y.; BATISTELLA, M.; CHALLIES, E.; CONNOR, T.; FRIIS, C.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A.; PARISH, E.; ROMULO, C. L.; SILVA, R. F. B.; TRIEZENBERG, H.; YANG, H.; ZHAO, Z.; ZIMMERER, K. S.; HUETTMANN, F.; TREGLIA, M. L.; BASHER, Z.; CHUNG, M. G.; HERZBERGER, A.; LENSCHOW, A.; MECHICHE-ALAMI, A.; NEWIG, J.; ROCHE, J.; SUN, J. Spillover systems in a telecoupled Anthropocene: typology, methods, and governance for global sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, v. 33, p. 58-69, Aug. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/08/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/08/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 5 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. F. B. da; BATISTELLA, M.; MORAN, E.; CELIDONIO, O. L. de M.; MILLINGTON, J. D. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAMON FELIPE BICUDO DA SILVA, Unicamp; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPTIA, Unicamp; EMILIO MORAN, Michigan State University; OTÁVIO LEMOS DE MELO CELIDONIO, SENAR-MT; JAMES D. A. MILLINGTON, King’s College London. |
|
Título: |
The soybean trap: challenges and risks for Brazilian producers. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 4, p. 1-13, Feb. 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00012 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Article 12. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Since the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valuable and important strategies tokeep producers in the soybean business and out of traps. These findings are importantgiven the neoliberal context in which individual producersfind themselves and whichpresents challenges that alone they can do little to change.Policies that enable individualproducers to make environmentally- and financially-sound agricultural decisions are vitalto ensure a sustainable soybean system that does not trap producers in endless cyclesof debt and investment MenosSince the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valua... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural inputs; Agricultural risks; Agricultural treadmill; Food commodity; Profit margins; Riscos agrícolas. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02821naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2124350
005 2020-08-13
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00012$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, R. F. B. da
245 $aThe soybean trap$bchallenges and risks for Brazilian producers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle 12.
520 $aSince the 1970s, Brazilian soybean production has grown rapidly, driven by increasingnational and international demand and rising prices. Consequently, soybean productionhas come to be perceived as an attractive opportunity, with the number of farmsproducing soybean across the country reaching around 240,000 in 2017. However,producers can become trapped by dependencies on moneylenders, traders and inputsupply companies, facing so-called? agricultural treadmills?. In this study we undertookinterviews with individual soybean producers and representatives of trader companies,producers? associations, the processing industry, government and civil society, and usedthese data to analyze rural production operations related to the soybean supply chainand to interpret how agricultural treadmills persist in this sector. Based on literaturereview and fieldwork interviews, we found that producers have been able to add valueto their products, but some strategies they use to cope with production costs lead theminto high-risk situations. Our findings show that, sectoral(e.g., producers? associations)and collective actions (e.g., farmers? buying groups) are auseful strategy for producersto gain influence and bargaining power against transnational companies and inputsuppliers compared to acting as an individual within the soybean supply chain. Producerswere emphatic that the current soybean business is now much more than just farmingactivities, and that education and training are highly valuable and important strategies tokeep producers in the soybean business and out of traps. These findings are importantgiven the neoliberal context in which individual producersfind themselves and whichpresents challenges that alone they can do little to change.Policies that enable individualproducers to make environmentally- and financially-sound agricultural decisions are vitalto ensure a sustainable soybean system that does not trap producers in endless cyclesof debt and investment
650 $aAgricultura
653 $aAgricultural inputs
653 $aAgricultural risks
653 $aAgricultural treadmill
653 $aFood commodity
653 $aProfit margins
653 $aRiscos agrícolas
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
700 1 $aMORAN, E.
700 1 $aCELIDONIO, O. L. de M.
700 1 $aMILLINGTON, J. D. A.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems$gv. 4, p. 1-13, Feb. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
